Evaluation
| Grading allocation | Allocation | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Terms of Reference | 2% | |
| Project Plans | 1% | |
| Requirements | 8% | |
| Design | 8% | |
| Work-in-progress link | 3% | |
| Mid-term proj status meeting | 15% | |
| Test plan | 10% | |
| System delivery | 46% | |
| Participation (proj attendance) | 7% | |
| Individual performance factor | 0.50 - 1.0 | Based on team mate peer review and TA/Instructor assessment |
Please check the course schedule for due dates
Key Criteria
-
Detailed Documents with completeness, breath of coverage. Incorporate innovative process & techniques.
-
Team Based evaluation on project milestone deliverables.
-
Project Status meeting/Demo incorporates individual performance factor (ie: a multiplier of the team grade)
-
Late deliverables will be 10% reduction per day
Must receive 50% + for delivery/Demo/warranty to pass course.
Details
Deliverables as noted in previous slides. Very much like real world project deliverables and there is no answer key.
-
Subjective evaluation based on a combination of experience
- TA
- Me
- Your teammates
- Your industry project sponsors
VERY few templates provided (by design). If this does not make you comfortable, another course maybe better for you
Individual performance factor
A factor applied to your team mark which ranges from 0.50 to 1.0. Input collected twice (prior to the mid year status meetings and prior to project completion). Anticipate majority of students will have a factor of 1.0.
-
Two inputs which determined multiplier factor:
- Your team mates assessment of your contribution.
- Your TA assessment of your contribution.